<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 Mobile Search Services Mini-Reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing views and reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=171#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I tried to avoid making any really biased calls - but, on re-reading the 4Info section, I did possibly give the impression that I didn't care for them.

Actually, I found their services to be quite handy: the single query interface is great.  

I think you've hit the crux of the matter in saying "if I'm using a mobile search engine, I have a specific need and would want a limited scope".  I suspect this is a factor which needs to be considered: people using mobile devices have very specific needs.

I certainly agree with the desirability of limited scope, but I think it's also beneficial to go to a single location to access these various micro-searches: on Ask.com and AOL, this is easily done, because they provide very immediate access to the various scopes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to avoid making any really biased calls - but, on re-reading the 4Info section, I did possibly give the impression that I didn&#8217;t care for them.</p>
<p>Actually, I found their services to be quite handy: the single query interface is great.  </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve hit the crux of the matter in saying &#8220;if I&#8217;m using a mobile search engine, I have a specific need and would want a limited scope&#8221;.  I suspect this is a factor which needs to be considered: people using mobile devices have very specific needs.</p>
<p>I certainly agree with the desirability of limited scope, but I think it&#8217;s also beneficial to go to a single location to access these various micro-searches: on Ask.com and AOL, this is easily done, because they provide very immediate access to the various scopes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christen O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Christen O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=171#comment-59</guid>
		<description>You make some good points but I gotta say -- if I'm using a mobile search engine, I have a specific need and would want a limited scope -- especially on a mobile phone with a 3-inch screen. If I was doing general research, sure, I'd want a lot more. But that's not the purpose of 4info. FYI --They are going to be one of the companies at the next Under the Radar: Mobility -- more info here -http://undertheradarblog.com/under-the-radar-mobility-conference/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points but I gotta say &#8212; if I&#8217;m using a mobile search engine, I have a specific need and would want a limited scope &#8212; especially on a mobile phone with a 3-inch screen. If I was doing general research, sure, I&#8217;d want a lot more. But that&#8217;s not the purpose of 4info. FYI &#8211;They are going to be one of the companies at the next Under the Radar: Mobility &#8212; more info here -http://undertheradarblog.com/under-the-radar-mobility-conference/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=171#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Must have - it's working fine now!

And, for what it's worth, I like the way it works better than Google's compression algorithm: you've streamlined things without adding the curious extra navigation structure which Google's XHTML search imposes.

Thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must have - it&#8217;s working fine now!</p>
<p>And, for what it&#8217;s worth, I like the way it works better than Google&#8217;s compression algorithm: you&#8217;ve streamlined things without adding the curious extra navigation structure which Google&#8217;s XHTML search imposes.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Perkins, CEO Greenlight Wireless</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Perkins, CEO Greenlight Wireless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=171#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Great review. I think you caught us during a brief maintenance window.

Try it again!

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. I think you caught us during a brief maintenance window.</p>
<p>Try it again!</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dalka</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dalka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=171#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Nice post. 

I will be speaking at eComXpo on October 24th, viewing it is free, please sign up via the link on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. </p>
<p>I will be speaking at eComXpo on October 24th, viewing it is free, please sign up via the link on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=171#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I think your gut instinct is right - in both ways. 

Google has all the resources; but sometimes they organize their products like engineers (no surprises there, I guess.)

They could really stand to bring in some usability consultants: they won the first stage with their simple search, but are losing their hold on that particular advantage with the complexity of their newer offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your gut instinct is right - in both ways. </p>
<p>Google has all the resources; but sometimes they organize their products like engineers (no surprises there, I guess.)</p>
<p>They could really stand to bring in some usability consultants: they won the first stage with their simple search, but are losing their hold on that particular advantage with the complexity of their newer offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/mobile-services/8-mobile-search-services-mini-reviewed/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=171#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Nice review, Joe.   Thanks.

Good to see all of these described all in one place.  I expect that we will see an incredibly rapid evolution of services from these companies in the future.  

My gut instinct is that Google will broaden what they offer even more - I'm not sure it will result in a better search, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review, Joe.   Thanks.</p>
<p>Good to see all of these described all in one place.  I expect that we will see an incredibly rapid evolution of services from these companies in the future.  </p>
<p>My gut instinct is that Google will broaden what they offer even more - I&#8217;m not sure it will result in a better search, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
