<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arguing about Page Rank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/google/arguing-about-page-rank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/google/arguing-about-page-rank/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing views and reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are you &#8220;nofollowing&#8221; yourself? &#124; inter:digital strategies</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/google/arguing-about-page-rank/#comment-15577</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you &#8220;nofollowing&#8221; yourself? &#124; inter:digital strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/google/arguing-about-page-rank/#comment-15577</guid>
		<description>[...] were a meaningful metric, this argument would be patently absurd. (And I&#8217;m not getting into that argument right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] were a meaningful metric, this argument would be patently absurd. (And I&#8217;m not getting into that argument right [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
