<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apologies to Quizlaw.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/follow-up/apologies-to-quizlawcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/follow-up/apologies-to-quizlawcom/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing views and reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/follow-up/apologies-to-quizlawcom/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 06:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=116#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I'm glad I didn't cause any real offense - nonetheless, my statement was, as you say, ambiguous.  

The original problem is an important issue - for searchers, businesses, and the future of internet advertising.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I didn&#8217;t cause any real offense - nonetheless, my statement was, as you say, ambiguous.  </p>
<p>The original problem is an important issue - for searchers, businesses, and the future of internet advertising.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/follow-up/apologies-to-quizlawcom/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.interdigitalstrategies.com/blog/?p=116#comment-26</guid>
		<description>No offense was taken - the point of our comment was just to clarify any ambiguity in your original article. But the apology is appreciated anyway. And, for the record, we agree with the original subject matter and are equally dismayed by the increasing amount of worthless ad-based sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense was taken - the point of our comment was just to clarify any ambiguity in your original article. But the apology is appreciated anyway. And, for the record, we agree with the original subject matter and are equally dismayed by the increasing amount of worthless ad-based sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
