Mesothelioma is a famously expensive term to purchase in Google’s Adwords program. The actual most expensive terms in Adwords fluctuate pretty regularly – but certain types of terms and search phrases are consistently extremely expensive.

Sample high spend terms from Google’s Adwords Tool today:

• mesothelioma lawyers – $27.32
• mesothelioma treatmenst – $21.86
• chicago personal injury lawyers – $39.62
• chicago personal injury attorneys – $37.74
• consolidate student loans – $41.19
• consolidate school loans – $41.36
• mortgage refinance rates – $33.41
• refinance my mortgage – $32.06
• search engine optimization firm – $20.89

Pricing for Adwords is on a bid structure – in order to achieve high placement, you need to be willing to pay more than the next person in line. Therefore, certain very desirable terms inevitably climb to the highest point somebody is willing to pay. When you are working with Adwords you need to be extremely careful in bidding – it is very easy to take your spending past the point where it is actually profitable for you.

How do terms like these remain profitable? Well, for the most part, these are terms in the legal or financial industries – hugely expensive industries where a single new client may be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars or more. Consolidating a single student’s loan package can easily reach $100,000 dollars – and the profit on that loan, in investment value and interest payments can be enormous. Is it worth $41.19 per click? Possibly, at least as long as your conversion rate is high enough. (Without knowing the actual profit margins on these transactions, I can’t really guess the needed conversion rate, of course.)

So, presumably, the bidders on a major high-spend keyword like mesothelioma are legal associations looking to represent what could be major industry lawsuits or medical associations looking to provide information on the disease and access to insurance or medical aid.

Well, one would think, at any rate.

However, in this spam-filled world, the top 10 ad placements on Google as of my search for "what is mesothelioma" at 10:50 AM CEDT are largely dominated by spam. The URL’s displayed by these ads are, in order from top to bottom:

• MesotheliomaAsbestosLungCancer.com
• www.lungusa.org
• Mesothelioma1.net
• www.breastcancer.org/dictionary
• www.info.com/Mesothelioma
• www.quizlaw.com
• asbestos.free-resource-guide.com
• Mesothelioma.getfast.info
• tips2info.com

I visited all of these URL’s (without clicking their ads) to check them out, on the off hand chance they were actually legit. As expected, the American Lung Association (lungusa.org) is legit. breastcancer.org is also legit. www.quizlaw.com is MOSTLY a legitimate site, but they do have this interesting page. Is this the landing page for their ad? I don’t really know…but one suspects.

The remaining six results were unequivocably made-for-advertising sites of no meaningful value. How can these sites profit on this advertising? Presumably, the average visitor, having cost them $40 by clicking on their ad, will only click on ONE outgoing ad, or perhaps two? Given the percentages granted to advertisers, it’s hard to imagine this can be profitable. But these sites are so incredibly cheap to create that it is no trouble to maintain a thousand of them – and the offhand traffic or incidental searches are what keep them profitable. Nevertheless, it’s hard to perceive the value of adwords expense for this.

Regardless of the profitability of spam websites, they are a frustrating phenomenon. Six out of nine results were worthless non-resources – one of the other three was probably driving traffic to a nearly worthless page, even though the site itself seems to be somewhat valuable. The two remaining organizations are both non-profits – spending a huge amount of money hoping to educate people.

A search for "mesothelioma lawyers" is little different – the ad results include many of the same results now including such highly relevant addresses as www.wakeboarder.com/Mesothelioma and www.Bargainrama.com.

What’s the lesson? I feel that if you are in a legitimate business which is working in an area which requires these kind of high-spend terms you are far better off ignoring pay-per-click advertising altogether. The density of garbage in the ads will quickly drive attention from your ads and the expense may be very difficult to justify.

The complete announcement at the Adwords Blog provides detailed information.

This could open up a whole new marketing campaign style with Google Adwords – viral video marketing has, on a number of occasions, created circumstances where a particular video circulates exceptionally heavily due to the network buzz. What happens if a video only available through the Adwords network becomes virally popular? Does this mean that sites which may potentially be carrying that video gain massive traffic, just to visit an ad? Will the key search terms which spawn the ad suddenly spike in Google? What does this mean for keyword analysis?

I’m assuming also, that only a click through the advertisement to the destination site will be billed – but I’d be concerned that the number of accidental clicks could skyrocket, if viewers are accidentally clicking on the destination URL instead of the video. Although, given the small area which is specified for the destination URL this shouldn’t be a huge issue.

This new product raises some interesting marketing possibilities – and a few intriguing questions!

It’s important to note that your account time zone can be set only once, so please choose wisely!

Google

Search Engine Watch recently made note of the new option to set your account time zone in Google Adwords. I’d further mention that this option also applies to Google Analytics accounts. I’d also like to mention that I’m really not very happy about the inability to change your account time zone.

Is this system truly so complex that this factor, once set, cannot be altered?
I appreciate the idea that I can set a time zone and view my statistics using one baseline relevant to myself. But choosing a time zone is not an easy matter – do I base it on where I am now, knowing that I’m living here temporarily? No. How about my next place of living, where I’ll be living for at least 3 years – but possibly not longer. Maybe. What about further on? Ouch!

Part of the greatness of the internet is that location is only partially applicable for a given business – and I’d prefer, on the whole, to monitor my statistics using the baseline of my current location. Or, alternately, monitoring all my statistics based purely on Greenwich Mean for the sake of simplicity…

However, the article draws your attention not only to the relatively obvious source of information, but to a very recent question and answer post from the official AdWords blog. The post provides a lot of great information about just what click fraud is and how it works.

Of course, they don’t share a lot of details about their technology. This is probably for the best, since there are certainly people about who would immediately find ways to thwart their detection system. However, it does give us alot of general purpose information about their techniques and an impression of their concern.

In general, they sound dedicated to the issue, to me. The post on the main Google blog is all about the impending resolution to a lawsuit concerning their click fraud policies and it seems that this law suit has resulted in continuing refinement and analysis of the issues.

In this day and age, the web designers mantra should be about accessibility. In my other blog, I’ve recently posted about design for the deaf, accessibility for the learning disabled, and designing for mobile devices. I considered design for alternate browsers, such as Mozilla Firefox or Opera to be so fundamental that it’s incorporated into my core design philosophy. Yet Microsoft considers that 10% of the marketplace to be so insignificant that they will not even allow them to sign up for the system. In fact, that 10% may not even function with the system! Your ads may never be seen by individuals using alternate browsers.

And to add insult to injury, MSN’s official solution was to advise customer service reps and customers to switch to IE6, posts Danny Sullivan, at Search Engine Watch. It’s well worth noting that, according to Tyson Kirksey, IE7 doesn’t function with adCenter either. So, clearly, if you’ve committed the sin of wanting to test IE7, you’ll need to revert to IE6 to use this Microsoft product.

It’s a well known opinion that the majority of tech professionals are inclined to use alternate browsers. Thus, it should have occurred to Microsoft that their disinclination to support these browsers could have a rapid backlash in the tech community. When so many people in the higher-regions of SEO industry discussion immediately notice these problems, the word that gets out is not good.

I think that my opinions are apparent in this article – but Microsoft probably won’t notice.

Their product is designed around the popular "taggin" which is done for blog posts on Technorati, for links on Ma.gnolia and “Del.icio.us and for images with Flickr. The idea is that you pick a few tags for you advertisement, and your ads will be delivered to sites and search results pages which are related to those tags.

Unlike all the sites I mention above, the tags at Dumbfind will not be produced by human decision – instead, the search engine will automatically analyze the sites and apply tags.

For the advertiser, the advantage is that you will not be picking specific keywords where your ad will only be shown for that set of searches. Instead, you can pick a few tags that are relevant to your product and have all searches which results in pages with those tags bring up your ad.

If the Dumbfind tagging algorithm really works, this could be a great product. If not, well . . . there are a lot of search engines, and a lot of great ideas at the feet of crumbled businesses. The biggest question for me is how carefully they’ll be able to protect against spam sites – it all comes down to their tagging algorithm.

While in Beta, the site is offering a promotional deal for free ads. Any free ad created during this promotional period will last for 60 days – at no charge. It can hardly hurt to experiment with the site right now!